Comments on: Mordenkainen’s Tome of Foes Review (D&D 5e) https://www.tribality.com/2018/05/17/mordenkainens-tome-of-foes-review-dd-5e/ D&D / Role Playing Thu, 14 Jun 2018 12:44:32 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.2 By: tribality https://www.tribality.com/2018/05/17/mordenkainens-tome-of-foes-review-dd-5e/#comment-5257 Sun, 20 May 2018 04:30:00 +0000 https://www.tribality.com/?p=24195#comment-5257 In reply to Freds.

I guess Elminster or someone else from FR might have been better for you then. That being said, I think this is a useful book for DMs looking for higher CR monsters ideas and worth a look.

As a Dragonlance and Eberron guy I don’t feel supported either, but there are so many old books and 5e can be run pretty well from them.

maybe this quote will help with the sting as Mordenkain’s focus on balance is what puts him in the author seat for the tome.
“This book contains Mordenkainen’s first expression of the Balance. In here, he starts to describe the multiverse as a collection of opposing forces.”

]]>
By: Freds https://www.tribality.com/2018/05/17/mordenkainens-tome-of-foes-review-dd-5e/#comment-5256 Sun, 20 May 2018 00:58:00 +0000 https://www.tribality.com/?p=24195#comment-5256 In reply to tribality.

The bait-and-switch thing mentioned above. I feel that by slapping Mordenkainen’s name on the cover, this is a cheap ploy by WotC to trick Greyhawk fans into thinking they’re picking up a Greyhawk book.

“See, we haven’t abandoned your setting, here’s Mordenkainen!”

As a Greyhawk guy, I find this especially irksome, but it would have been the same if they had name-dropped Raistlin, or van Richten, or whoever. If the actual content is setting-neutral, the book’s name should be setting-neutral. It’s dishonest and I’m not going to reward WotC for lying.

]]>
By: tribality https://www.tribality.com/2018/05/17/mordenkainens-tome-of-foes-review-dd-5e/#comment-5255 Sun, 20 May 2018 00:29:00 +0000 https://www.tribality.com/?p=24195#comment-5255 In reply to Freds.

This book isn’t for everyone. Just curious, what is your reason for skipping the book?

]]>
By: tribality https://www.tribality.com/2018/05/17/mordenkainens-tome-of-foes-review-dd-5e/#comment-5254 Sun, 20 May 2018 00:28:00 +0000 https://www.tribality.com/?p=24195#comment-5254 In reply to Freds.

The content of this book could really help you add places to visit from any setting. the Feywild, Shadowfell, Nine Hells, Astral Plane, etc… like Greyhawk (Oerth), Dragonlance (Krynn), Eberron. etc are all part of the multiverse.

]]>
By: Dave(s) 4 Goombella https://www.tribality.com/2018/05/17/mordenkainens-tome-of-foes-review-dd-5e/#comment-5253 Sat, 19 May 2018 11:05:00 +0000 https://www.tribality.com/?p=24195#comment-5253 In reply to Freds.

Tome of Foes is generally written as “setting neutral” as possible. Faerun is treated as just another world for the most part.

]]>
By: Freds https://www.tribality.com/2018/05/17/mordenkainens-tome-of-foes-review-dd-5e/#comment-5251 Fri, 18 May 2018 23:56:00 +0000 https://www.tribality.com/?p=24195#comment-5251 In reply to tribality.

Definitely skipping.

]]>
By: Freds https://www.tribality.com/2018/05/17/mordenkainens-tome-of-foes-review-dd-5e/#comment-5250 Fri, 18 May 2018 23:55:00 +0000 https://www.tribality.com/?p=24195#comment-5250 In reply to Dave(s) 4 Goombella.

So I’m guessing from the “other worlds” mentioned, that Forgotten Realms is the assumed default world? If so, why isn’t this Elminster’s tome instead of Mordenkainen’s? (I don’t actually expect you to know, I’m just venting.)

Seems like a bait-and-switch designed to lure in Greyhawk fans.

]]>
By: Dave(s) 4 Goombella https://www.tribality.com/2018/05/17/mordenkainens-tome-of-foes-review-dd-5e/#comment-5249 Fri, 18 May 2018 17:47:00 +0000 https://www.tribality.com/?p=24195#comment-5249 In reply to Freds.

The book’s lore chapters do contain sidebars on other worlds (Greyhawk, Krynn, Athas) similar to those in the 5e PHB, but a little more detailed. In the Halfling chapter, for example, they mention that a similar race exists on Krynn called Kender. They don’t, however, go into detail about how the Greystone of Gargath created the Kender race.

]]>
By: Dave(s) 4 Goombella https://www.tribality.com/2018/05/17/mordenkainens-tome-of-foes-review-dd-5e/#comment-5247 Fri, 18 May 2018 17:22:00 +0000 https://www.tribality.com/?p=24195#comment-5247 I picked up my copy earlier today, and have had some time to flip through. I definitely like the monsters: ultra-powerful humanoids, star shards, elder elementals, and of course the Giff. The lore sections are also great, especially the chapter on Gith. They’ve always been a favorite of mine.

I’m slightly disappointed that there are no new beasts for Rangers and Druids, though. Not that there aren’t already enough in the Monstrous Manual; I’m just greedy.

]]>
By: Manos Ti https://www.tribality.com/2018/05/17/mordenkainens-tome-of-foes-review-dd-5e/#comment-5242 Fri, 18 May 2018 08:35:00 +0000 https://www.tribality.com/?p=24195#comment-5242 In reply to tribality.

Just got in the office and coming here I picked up my limited edition copy.

My FLGS had really stocked for this one; I counted thirteen special edition copies in pre-order (just like mine), four special edition copies available for sale plus another ten of the regular copies. This is the first time they do that in such a volume.

OK, the content is marvelous. Mordi is a calligrapher it seems, although not funny like the previous gentlemen that provided us with guides.

Art is of course top level, although some of it come from previous publications.

The same goes for some of the stat blocks (as the Demon Lords for instance) and I’m pretty sure that the same goes for the text. Well, this is a bit disappointing; I am fully on board with WotCs’ policy to limit the essential books in order to play, but I would really like to make each book truly unique. I hope there is some more lore about the Demon Lords or the other shared content, I haven’t had the chance to read the book through.

Anyhow, a nice addition to 5e!!!

]]>